Following the recent attempt on the life of Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico, the political climate in both Slovakia and Europe is having to deal with an unsettling reality.

The blatant attack highlights the long-standing conflicts and divisions within Slovakian society as well as more general worries about the spread of populism and the degradation of democratic norms throughout the continent. It is distinguished by its evident political motivation.

Prime Minister Fico was shot numerous times outside a cultural center in Banska Bystrica on May 15, an incident that rocked the country and sent shockwaves across Europe. The official government’s following remarks, which revealed a blatant political motivation for the attack, added to the public’s concerns over Slovakia’s democracy and legal system. It’s critical to consider the underlying causes of this unfortunate tragedy while investigations continue and medical professionals continue to treat Mr. Fico.

In Slovakian politics, Robert Fico has long been divisive. He has supported populist rhetoric and implemented policies that have frequently sparked controversy both domestically and internationally during his time as prime minister. His pro-Russian, anti-American rhetoric that propelled him back to power in recent years has only deepened rifts within Slovakian society and sparked worries among EU members about Slovakia’s future.

Slovakia is not alone in witnessing the development of populism in Europe; yet, analyzing the particular circumstances behind each country’s manifestation of this phenomenon is important.

Economic inequality, cultural concerns, and the perception of political establishment corruption have all made Slovakia a favorable environment for populist ideas to flourish. Fico’s political language has struck a chord with a sizable section of the population, escalating social divisions as it plays on these complaints while also advancing a nationalist agenda.

Still, blaming the murder attempt exclusively on internal political forces would be oversimplified. Another degree of complication is added by the larger geopolitical background, which is marked by growing tensions between the West and Russia. Slovakia’s European friends, who fear a possible slide away from the Western mainstream, are certainly concerned about Fico’s affiliation with Russia and his outspoken criticism of Western institutions.

Prime Minister Fico’s attempted murder serves as a sobering warning of what happens when political division and democratic standards are undermined. The fundamental cornerstones of democracy are threatened when political discourse grows more polarizing and politicians take advantage of social frustrations for their own gain. A risky precedent that threatens the values of free and fair elections, peaceful handovers of power, and the rule of law is the normalizing of violence as a form of political expression.

The authorities of Slovakia and the rest of Europe must reiterate their dedication to democratic values and the rule of law in the wake of this horrific incident. Conflicts over politics should be settled by discussion and debate rather than threats and violence. Furthermore, increased efforts are needed to address the underlying issues that give rise to populism, with an emphasis on advancing social cohesion, economic opportunity, and political responsibility.

The international community must, however, continue to be watchful in protecting democratic values and offering assistance to those who are dedicated to keeping them. Members of the European Union must stand together to face the problems presented by populism and outside threats to democracy. European nations can send a strong message that violence and extremism will not be accepted in any form by uniting and reiterating their shared commitment to democratic norms.

Undoubtedly, Slovakia has many obstacles on the road ahead, but there is also room for improvement and a renewed dedication to the principles that support a robust democracy. As he continues his recuperation, Prime Minister Fico’s experience ought to act as a call to action for everyone who thinks that democracy has the capacity to transcend differences and create a brighter future for future generations.